Is 0.00000000…1 (1 at infinity) exactly equal to the perfect zero or are they still unequal?

I found an answer from sep.stanford.edu
IMAGE ESTIMATION BY EXAMPLE: Geophysical Soundings Image ...
Apr 7, 2013 ... itself comes in four flavors: (1) drift (zero to low frequency), (2) white or ... ematicians are very good at stating exactly what the assumptions are. ...... In practice we typically allocate equal space for input and output. ...... 13 0.00000000 ..... also scale a gradient vector by a positive definite matrix and we can still.
For more information, see IMAGE ESTIMATION BY EXAMPLE: Geophysical Soundings Image ...
I found an answer from web.stanford.edu
TSP 5.1 Reference Manual
developed by economists (starting with Version 1 in 1967) and most of its .... left and on the right are not equal; otherwise it is zero. < .LT. gives the value 1 when the variable on ...... have a variable variance (but still have zero conditional mean ) over the .... Finally the interpreted form of the command is shown, exactly as it is.
For more information, see TSP 5.1 Reference Manual
I found an answer from sepwww.stanford.edu
GEOPHYSICAL ESTIMATION BY EXAMPLE
Mar 12, 2008 ... Dividing by zero smoothly • Damped solution • Smoothing the de- ..... exactly how the many interesting illustrations in this book were .... sounding devices to a geophysical image, a 1-, 2-, or 3-dimensional ...... events have unequal amplitudes, but after enough iterations they are equal, ...... 0.00000000.
For more information, see GEOPHYSICAL ESTIMATION BY EXAMPLE
I found an answer from en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/Science/October 2005 - Wikipedia
Very possibly, many cases were not diagnosed, some of them are still hidden, ..... You can't say that i is "equal to the square root of -1", because "the square root of ..... So your first three lines are doing exactly what I did above, only nowhere in .... One way to cut this down that hopefully will not happen, is to reduce it to zero, ...
For more information, see Wikipedia:Reference desk archive/Science/October 2005 - Wikipedia
I found an answer from ntrs.nasa.gov
(OSAC)
Aug 11, 1993 ... If the inner radius, R1, is zero, then the center "ring" has only one ..... OSAC is run in exactly the same way for a toroidal surface as for any ...... (Note: GEN (1) equals VAL (0, I) as specified by the user in ...... perfect focus at the second ellipse's back focus. ...... Note that the x and y scales are unequal, giving.
For more information, see (OSAC)
The doubt seems valid.
But unless you specify the position of 1 in the number, the notation does mean nothing. Mean to say, the given notation itself is incorrect and doesn't fit any existing numbering systems.
So the given number is neither zero nor anything else.